A shot of hope with a game changing vaccine

A shot of hope with a game changing vaccine

Part of: GS-III- Economy-Health (PT-MAINS-PERSONALITY TEST)

Social Vaccine

• A social vaccine is a metaphor for a series of social and behavioural measures that governments can use to raise public consciousness about unhealthy situations through social mobilisation.
• Social mobilisation can empower populations to resist unhealthy practices, increase resilience, and foster advocacy for change.
• This can drive political will to take action in the interests of society and hold governments accountable to address the social determinants of health by adopting progressive socio-economic policies and regulatory mechanisms that promote health equity and reduce vulnerability to disease.

How it helps?

• When applied to pandemics, the effectiveness of a social vaccine is determined by the extent of dissemination and uptake of accurate information about personal infection risk and methods to reduce the risk through consistent core messages disseminated through a variety of means.
• A social vaccine addresses barriers and facilitators of behaviour change, whether attitudinal, social, cultural, or economic, and supplements Information, Education, and Communication (IEC) with targeted Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) strategies.

Example

• Uganda and Thailand used these strategies effectively during the HIV/AIDS pandemic to bring down the incidence of HIV infection, before Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Treatment (HAART) was introduced in 1995.
• They demonstrated how an effective social vaccine helped “flatten the curve” till effective treatments were discovered that dramatically reduced mortality, viral loads and infection transmission.

Lessons from the HIV pandemic

1. Timeline of HIV/AIDS

• The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) that causes the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is believed to have made the zoonotic jump from monkeys through chimpanzees to humans in Africa as early as the 1920s, but the HIV/AIDS epidemic was detected in 1981 and was a pandemic by 1985.
• From 1981 till 2018, around 74.9 (range: 58.3 to 98.1) million people worldwide were HIV-infected, and around 32.0 (range: 23.6 to 43.8) million died (43%, range: 41 to 45%) from AIDS-related illnesses.
• The early years of the HIV/AIDS pandemic were also a time of global panic. The cause was unknown (till 1984) and diagnostic tests were unavailable (till 1985). Since there was no treatment, a diagnosis of HIV infection was a death sentence.

2. The stigma of HIV/AIDS

• Widespread fears of contagion rendered many infected people homeless and unemployed. Many were denied access to care.
• Shame, discrimination and violence towards infected individuals, their families, social groups (sex-workers, gay men, drug users, truck drivers, migrants), and even health workers, were common.
• Criminalising sex-work and injecting drug use followed.
• Conspiracy theories, misinformation and unproven remedies were widely propagated.
• The blame game targeted world leaders and international agencies. The preparedness of health systems, societal prejudices and socio-economic inequities were starkly exposed.

3. Preventive strategy

• The core preventive messages involved being faithful to one sexual partner or 100% condom use during sexual intercourse outside stable relationships; resisting peer-pressure for risky behaviours, and harm reduction for intravenous drug use.
• These measures conflicted with prevailing cultural, social, religious, behavioural and legal norms.
• IEC and SBCC activities targeted (and partnered) individuals, families, community leaders, peer-led community networks and social and health systems to change attitudes and behaviours. Religious and community leaders were key change agents.
  • For example, the Catholic Church in Uganda did not initially support promoting condoms for safe sex since its use prevents life.
  • After large numbers of people died of AIDS, their tacit acknowledgment that their religion did not preclude the use of condoms to prevent death was an important turning point.
• Thailand pioneered the effective use of social marketing of condoms for safe sex and used humour to defuse social taboos about publicly discussing sex.

These strategies and advocacy against stigma and discrimination were successfully adapted in India.

How it can work in the present scenario?

• The core infection-control messages are available from official sources.
  • Maintaining physical distancing in social situations (unless impossible) and
  • Wearing cloth masks or facial coverings in public (especially where distancing is impossible) by 100% of the people (and 100% of the time) is key to preventing infection along with regular disinfection of oneself and one’s surroundings.
• People are more likely to practise these behaviours if all leaders (without exception) promote them publicly and consistently, the whole community believes in their importance, and if proper information, support, and materials are available and accessible.
• A social vaccine also requires people to hold leaders accountable to invest in:
  • rapidly scaling-up testing;
  • meeting the basic and economic needs of vulnerable sections;
  • providing psychological support where needed;
  • not communalising or politicising the pandemic;
  • providing adequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to front-line workers in health, sanitation, transport and other essential services; and
  • not compromising the privacy and dignity of infected individuals and their families in the interest of public health.

Conclusion

• Coercive or punitive methods are invariably counter-productive, as was seen with HIV/AIDS.
• There is still no biomedical vaccine for HIV/AIDS. Considering the limited efficacy and uptake of influenza vaccines, vaccines for SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 may not provide a panacea.
• Thus, the components of the social vaccine should be in place before relaxing or lifting the lockdown.